Re: binary array and record recv
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: binary array and record recv |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14808.1233069788@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: binary array and record recv (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: binary array and record recv
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On Tuesday 18 December 2007 18:30:22 Tom Lane wrote: >> Arguably, pg_dump from an older version should make sure that the auto >> rules should NOT get created, else it is failing to preserve an older >> view's behavior. > We extend properties of objects all the time. That is why we make new > releases. No one is required to use the new properties. > Should pg_dump also make sure that tables imported from an older version are > not usable for recursive unions or window functions, thus preserving the > older table's behavior? That argument seems fairly bogus. The addition of those features won't change the behavior of existing applications. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: