Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14781.1028318500@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations ("J. R. Nield" <jrnield@usol.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"J. R. Nield" <jrnield@usol.com> writes: > The predicate for files we MUST (fuzzy) copy is: > File exists at start of backup && File exists at end of backup Right, which seems to me to negate all these claims about needing a (horribly messy) way to read uncommitted system catalog entries, do blind reads, etc. What's wrong with just exec'ing tar after having done a checkpoint? (In particular, I *strongly* object to using the buffer manager at all for reading files for backup. That's pretty much guaranteed to blow out buffer cache. Use plain OS-level file reads. An OS directory search will do fine for finding what you need to read, too.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: