Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1477791.1675320029@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes: > Regarding the concern about a pre-receive hook blocking an emergency push, the > hook could approve every push where a string like "pgindent: no" appears in a > commit message within the push. You'd still want to make the tree clean > sometime the same week or so. It's cheap to provide a break-glass like that. I think the real question here is whether we can get all (or at least a solid majority of) committers to accept such draconian constraints. I'd buy into it, and evidently so would you, but I can't help noting that less than a quarter of active committers have bothered to comment on this thread. I suspect the other three-quarters would be quite annoyed if we tried to institute such requirements. That's not manpower we can afford to drive away. Maybe this should get taken up at the this-time-for-sure developer meeting at PGCon? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: