Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14772.1175879965@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory (Stuart Bishop <stuart.bishop@canonical.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory
Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stuart Bishop <stuart.bishop@canonical.com> writes: > After a test is run, the test harness kills any outstanding connections so > we can drop the test database. Without this, a failing test could leave open > connections dangling causing the drop database to block. Just to make it perfectly clear: we don't consider SIGTERMing individual backends to be a supported operation (maybe someday, but not today). That's why you had to resort to plpythonu to do this. I hope you don't have anything analogous in your production databases ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: