Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)

Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I probably should have exposed the query_id directly in the
> pg_stat_statements view, perhaps as "query_hash".

FWIW, I think that's a pretty bad idea; the hash seems to me to be
strictly an internal matter.  Given the sponginess of its definition
I don't really want it exposed to users.
        regards, tom lane