Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14696.1125675741@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Locale implementation questions (was: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch)
Re: Proof of concept COLLATE support with patch |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes: > I still doesn't get where the hostility towards this functionality comes from. We're not really willing to say "here is a piece of syntax REQUIRED BY THE SQL SPEC which we only support on some platforms". readline, O_DIRECT, and the like are a completely inappropriate analogy, because those are inherently platform-dependent (and not in the spec). The objection is fundamentally that a platform-specific implementation cannot be our long-term goal, and so expending effort on creating one seems like a diversion. If there were a plan put forward showing how this is just a useful way-station, and we could see how we'd later get rid of the glibc dependency without throwing away the work already done, then it would be a different story. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: