Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 146.951848074@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com> writes: > An alternative might be to remove the following sentence from the > release notes: > "Don't be concerned this is a dot-zero release. PostgreSQL does its > best to put out only solid releases, and this one is no exception." Uh, Don, that's wording that we expect will apply to the 7.0 *release*. We did not claim that the beta version has no known bugs. > [ much ranting snipped ] Thomas made an engineering judgment that supporting beta-testing of all the new foreign key features was more important than having a first beta release with no regression in the parser. You can argue that he made the wrong choice (I'm not sure if he did or not), but I don't think jumping on him like this is appropriate. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: