Re: pg_upgrade issues
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14580.1280266109@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade issues (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade issues
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Excerpts from depstein's message of lun jul 26 08:05:24 -0400 2010: >> I just want to note that one reason regclass may be used in user tables (as opposed to, say, regtype) is that in PL/pgSQLtrigger procedures there is a special variable TG_RELID, which provides a convenient reference to the table thatpulled the trigger (this is the case for some of our uses). > I've wanted to use regclass (and regproc too, for that matter) in some > db designs, but I've refrained precisely because of the movability issues. > Note that you can use TG_SCHEMANAME and TG_RELNAME in plpgsql triggers > anyway. How does TG_RELID lead to wanting to store regclass columns, exactly? I've always supposed that was a legacy parameter rather than something anyone would actually use. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: