Re: multivariate statistics v14

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tomas Vondra
Тема Re: multivariate statistics v14
Дата
Msg-id 1457547490.24545.90.camel@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: multivariate statistics v14  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 18:21 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 08:45 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Tomas Vondra
> > <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > thanks for the feedback. Attached is v14 of the patch series, fixing
> > > most of the points you've raised.
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Tomas,
> > 
> > Applied to aa09cd242fa7e3a694a31f, I still get the seg faults in make
> > check if I configure without --enable-cassert.
> 
> Ah, after disabling asserts I can reproduce it too. And the reason why
> it fails is quite simple - clauselist_selectivity modifies the original
> list of clauses, which then confuses cost_qual_eval.

More precisely, it gets confused because the first clause in the list
gets deleted but cost_qual_eval never learns about that, and follows
stale pointer to the next cell, thus a segfault.

> 
> Can you try if the attached patch fixes the issue? I'll need to rework a
> bit more of the code, but let's see if this fixes the issue on your
> machine too.
> 
> > With --enable-cassert, it passes the regression test.
> 
> I wonder how can it work with casserts and fail without them. That's
> kinda exactly the opposite to what I'd expect ...

FWIW it seems to be somehow related to this assert in clausesel.c:
  Assert(count_mv_attnums(list_union(stat_clauses, stat_conditions),            relid, MV_CLAUSE_TYPE_MCV |
MV_CLAUSE_TYPE_HIST)>= 2);
 

With the assert in place, the code passes without a failure. After
removing the assert (commenting it out), or even just changing it to
   Assert(count_mv_attnums(stat_clauses, relid,                   MV_CLAUSE_TYPE_MCV | MV_CLAUSE_TYPE_HIST)        +
count_mv_attnums(stat_conditions,relid,                   MV_CLAUSE_TYPE_MCV | MV_CLAUSE_TYPE_HIST) >= 2);
 

i.e. removing the list_union, it fails as expected.

The only thing that I can think of is that list_union happens to place
the right stuff at the right position in memory - pure luck.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgbench small bug fix
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW