Re: 8.2 features status

> andrew@dunslane.net writes:
>>> I don't object to someone informally polling people who have claimed a
>>> TODO item and not produced any visible progress for awhile.  But I
>>> think
>>> anything like "thou shalt report in once a week" will merely drive
>>> people away from publicly claiming items, if not drive them away from
>>> doing anything at all.
>
>> The former is much more what I had in mind than the latter. Let's do
>> that.
>
> Like I said, no objection here.  But who exactly is "we" --- ie, who's
> going to do the legwork?  We surely don't want multiple people pestering
> the same developer ...
>

Perl has its pumpking ... maybe we need a designated "holder of the
trunk". I see that as a Core function.

cheers

andrew