Re: [ADMIN] locales and encodings Oh MY!
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ADMIN] locales and encodings Oh MY! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14524.1289588633@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [ADMIN] locales and encodings Oh MY! (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [ADMIN] locales and encodings Oh MY!
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> With how similar straight C and en_US.UTF8 are it was suggested to me, >> by persons who are far more C knowledgeable then I in my office, that >> this is something the PG community could "fix" . A "fix" being so that >> "col LIKE 'foo%' " could use btree indexes in locales like en_US.UTF8 >> (and probably some others). >> is the request unreasonable ? anyone got any idea of the price tag to >> make that happen ? > I thought it already did that. No, and the odds of it ever happening are insignificant. The sort order associated with en_US (and other "dictionary order" locales) is just too randomly different from what you need to optimize a LIKE search. (Whoever told you en_US sorts similarly to C is nuts.) The solution if you want the database's prevailing sort order to be en_US is to put an extra text_pattern_ops index on the column you want to do LIKE searches on. We might eventually have the ability to spell that "put a C-locale index on the column", but text_pattern_ops is the way to do it today. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: