Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14520.1173242097@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I said nothing about expired tuples. The point of not freezing is to >> preserve information about the insertion time of live tuples. > I don't know what good it will do -- for debugging? Exactly. As an example, I've been chasing offline a report from Merlin Moncure about duplicate entries in a unique index; I still don't know what exactly is going on there, but the availability of knowledge about which transactions inserted which entries has been really helpful. If we had a system designed to freeze tuples as soon as possible, that info would have been gone forever pretty soon after the problem happened. I don't say that this behavior can never be acceptable, but you need much more than a marginal performance improvement to convince me that it's worth the loss of forensic information. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: