Re: Query plans for plpgsql triggers
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Query plans for plpgsql triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14507.1143261580@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Query plans for plpgsql triggers ("Eric B. Ridge" <ebr@tcdi.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Query plans for plpgsql triggers
|
Список | pgsql-general |
"Eric B. Ridge" <ebr@tcdi.com> writes: > When is the UPDATE statement inside foo() planned? When the trigger > is first created, or when it's first used per backend, or every time > it's used per backend? First use per backend, ignoring corner cases such as replacing the function definition. > I dunno what plan is being generated, but it's gotta be using a > sequential scan. The issue is probably that the planner is seeing a parameterized query. Try this: prepare foo(int8) as update some_other_table SET field = 'value' WHERE id = $1; explain execute foo(42); and see what plan you get. If the id field has sufficiently discouraging statistics then the planner may think that a seqscan is the safest plan. In a "normal" query where you're comparing id to a constant, the planner can see whether the constant matches any of the most common values for the column --- if it doesn't then an indexscan is a good plan. If you really want a replan every time, you can get it by using EXECUTE. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: