Re: Update in all tables
| От | Owen Jacobson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Update in all tables |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 144D12D7DD4EC04F99241498BB4EEDCC233D2F@nelson.osl.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Update in all tables (Judith Altamirano Figueroa <jaltamirano@correolux.com.mx>) |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
Scott Marlowe wrote: > On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 15:13, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > > No, sorry. While we're at it, though, if you have the same field in > > several tables, it's a good sign that your database is badly > > normalised. You shouldn't have to update more than one table (which > > is why there isn't a way to do this automatically). > > Unless they're all FK/PK pairs, in which case you on update / delete > cascade FKs. It's entirely too bad this has to be designed into the DDL for the table. It'd be nice if you could specify "CASCADE" onUPDATE or DELETE queries. I don't see that it's any more of a gun than ON UPDATE/ON DELETE CASCADE in the foreign keydefinition. -Owen
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: