Re: postgres --help-config
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres --help-config |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14497.1066260176@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgres --help-config (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgres --help-config
Re: postgres --help-config |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > Tom Lane writes: >> But I don't see anything >> wrong with the concept. The short description is also the first >> sentence of the long description; what's unreasonable about that? > It constrains the writer of the description in a way he might not suspect. > For example, we have > check_function_bodies (boolean) > This parameter is normally true. When set false, it disables > validation ... > Then the primary description would become "This parameter is normally > true." You have a point, but on the other hand, as the author of that particular description I can feel free to criticize it. It's generally considered good style for the first sentence of a paragraph to convey the basic point. (In fact, I recall being dissatisfied with that text when I wrote it, but I was too rushed to fix it.) Maybe we should just go ahead and rewrite the variable descriptions to conform to this style. > I think there are two ways this can be resolved: > 1) Leave it this way, deal with it, but then we can put everything in one > field and let the software parse out the first sentence automatically. True. > 2) Make real separate "short" and "long" descriptions. We'd have to break the strings freeze to do that. How bad do you want it? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: