Re: Date/Time Types : internals
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Date/Time Types : internals |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14469.1335474919@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Date/Time Types : internals (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
I wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> So which calendar are we using, Julian or Gregorian? > Gregorian. I fail to see anyplace that suggests we use the Julian > calendar. We do understand the Julian date system, which is something > entirely different with a confusingly similar name. (Julian dates are > just a count of days since a reference point in 4713 BC.) On further reflection I wonder whether we shouldn't just get rid of "8.5.6. Internals", which is at best rather inappropriately placed. A person reading this portion of the docs probably couldn't care less whether we use Julian-date calculations internally. It might be appropriate to mention that in appendix B.4, where there's an actual explanation of what Julian dates are; but not here. What I think we should have here is an externally-facing specification, that is state that we follow the Gregorian calendar rules even for years before Pope Gregory's edict, and then reference B.4 for more info. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: