Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14423.1032751302@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > You don't :vote: on stuff like this ... Why not, exactly? I wasn't aware that any of core had a non-vetoable right to apply any patch we liked regardless of the number and strength of the objections. AFAIK, we resolve differences of opinion by discussion, followed by a vote if the discussion doesn't produce a consensus. It was pretty clear that Thomas' original patch lost the vote, or would have lost if we'd bothered to hold a formal vote. I don't see anyone arguing against the notion of making XLOG location more easily configurable --- it was just the notion of making it depend on environment variables that scared people. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: