Re: sort_mem statistics ...
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sort_mem statistics ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14404.1129673702@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | sort_mem statistics ... ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: sort_mem statistics ...
Re: sort_mem statistics ... Re: sort_mem statistics ... |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > do we maintain anything anywhere for this? mainly, some way of > determining # of 'sorts to disk' vs 'sort in memory', to determine whether > or not sort_mem is set to a good value? As of 8.1 you could turn on trace_sort to collect some data about this. Looking at the code, I notice that the messages are all emitted at level NOTICE. Perhaps that was not such a good idea --- it'd be pretty much in-your-face if it were on all the time. Does anyone think it'd be a good idea to emit the trace_sort messages at level LOG, instead? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: