Re: Removed unused import modules from tap tests
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Removed unused import modules from tap tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1437810.1636556007@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Removed unused import modules from tap tests (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: Removed unused import modules from tap tests
Re: Removed unused import modules from tap tests Re: Removed unused import modules from tap tests |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes: >> On 10 Nov 2021, at 13:37, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: >> ..but I wonder what's the *benefit* of removing those includes. IOW, what's >> the reason not to simply drop the patch? > I think the value is mostly neatnikism, the actual effect on runtime is > unlikely to be measureable. I won't argue against doing it, but I suspect > we'll just slowly add a lot of these back as tests evolve making excercise > less useful. Yeah, that last was pretty much my reaction. I don't know enough about Perl to be sure how much an unused import costs, but I suspect you're right that it won't be measurable in context, considering that most of these test scripts run at least one initdb. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: