Re: Proposal: Expose oldest xmin as SQL function for monitoring
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: Expose oldest xmin as SQL function for monitoring |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14378.1585777502@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Proposal: Expose oldest xmin as SQL function for monitoring (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: Expose oldest xmin as SQL function for monitoring
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> writes: > To my knowledge the current oldest xmin (GetOldestXmin() if I'm not > mistaken) isn't exposed directly in any view or function by Postgres. You could do something like select max(age(backend_xmin)) from pg_stat_activity; though I'm not sure whether that accounts for absolutely every process. > Am I missing anything in the above description? And if not, would > there be any reason why we would want to avoid exposing that > information? And if not, then would exposing it as a function be > acceptable? The fact that I had to use max(age(...)) in that sample query hints at one reason: it's really hard to do arithmetic correctly on raw XIDs. Dealing with wraparound is a problem, and knowing what's past or future is even harder. What use-case do you foresee exactly? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: