Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

Amit wrote:
> What if we write the above as: 
> 
> remotes-1 (london_servers-2 [london1, london2, london3], nc_servers-1
> [nc1, nc2])

Yes this we can consider.

Thanks,



-----
Beena Emerson

--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/Support-for-N-synchronous-standby-servers-take-2-tp5849384p5856869.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.