Re: PostgreSQL server listen on other port than 5432
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL server listen on other port than 5432 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14348.1248971628@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL server listen on other port than 5432 (Dotan Barak <dotanba@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL server listen on other port than 5432
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Dotan Barak <dotanba@gmail.com> writes: > The weird thing is that i used this port in a service that i wrote > only few seconds before this happened... Oh? How'd you start that service exactly? I'm thinking maybe the postmaster inherited the open file from its parent process. If it's not marked close-on-exec, which evidently it's not since the child processes have it too, then this could have happened as far as Postgres itself is concerned. I'm having a bit of a hard time imagining how an open file could have gotten transmitted from some other initscript to this one, but it seems more probable than any other theory at the moment. Do any other processes besides PG have that socket open? If you stop and restart the postmaster, does it open the socket again? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: