Re: [GENERAL] Re: My new job
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Re: My new job |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1433.971494282@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Re: My new job (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes: >> or we need to discuss something that would embarrass someone if it >> were publically known. > Personal opinions are of course private. Can you think of an example of a > secret embarrassing item that has affected the direction of the project? > I'd be fascinated! There have been a couple of cases where core has decided that a committer needed to be admonished ("yo, mon, why you committing new features during beta freeze?" or something like that). Marc has generally done the admonishing with a cc to core, but we don't embarrass people in public. I don't propose to name names here for obvious reasons. Another class of properly-private discussions have been reports of security-related bugs; that sort of thing seems best not mentioned too widely on the public lists until a fix is available. (BTW, if you ever have a security bug report that you don't think ought to be mentioned in the public archives, send it to pgsql-core.) Dunno about "affecting the course of the project". I don't think that core as core has all that much influence on the course of the project. Timing (release schedule) yes, because people allow us to decree that, but direction no. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: