Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1433.1246554830@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > Yes. What I was thinking of doing was committing a configure change to > reject flex < 2.5.31, and waiting to see how much of the buildfarm goes > red. Actually, most of the buildfarm members show which flex version they are running in the configure output. A quick look shows that of the 45 members that have reported on HEAD in the past 2 days, 22 are running 2.5.4, which is a lot higher than I was expecting. Most of these are the Solaris boxen, which I imagine can be updated fairly painlessly since there are some of them that are already running something newer. However I'm a bit worried about the situation for Windows --- does anyone know whether a newer flex is readily available for Windows? In any case it seems like it'd be prudent to prod the buildfarm owners to update their flex *before* we pull the trigger... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: