Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 142a230c-4fb5-317b-438a-ee5390873059@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/24/17 10:30 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Tom is correct here. They are not a net win for the average user. We > tend to forget that although we collectively have a lot of enterprise > installs where this does matter, we collectively do not equal near the > level of average user installs. > > From an advocacy perspective, the average user install is the one that > we tend most because that tending (in theory) will grow something that > is more fruitful e.g; the enterprise install over time because we > constantly and consistently provided a reasonable and expected > experience to the average user. I'm not completely grokking your second paragraph, but I would think that an average user would love got get a heads-up that their hardware is failing. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: