Re: BUG #13490: Segmentation fault on pg_stat_activity
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #13490: Segmentation fault on pg_stat_activity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14297.1436652379@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #13490: Segmentation fault on pg_stat_activity (Michael Bommarito <michael@bommaritollc.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #13490: Segmentation fault on pg_stat_activity
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Michael Bommarito <michael@bommaritollc.com> writes: > Hello Michael, > Here is the offending query and gdb session/stacktrace output. Please > let me know if we can provide anything else from gdb or logs that can be > anonymized. > *Query:* > 2015-07-11 12:57:41 UTC [12803-7] LOG: server process (PID 20696) was > terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault > 2015-07-11 12:57:41 UTC [12803-8] DETAIL: Failed process was running: > SELECT COUNT(*) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE pid <> pg_backend_pid() I tried tracing through the logic using the line numbers shown in this stack trace, and soon decided that they didn't seem to match the query you show above --- but on closer look, that's to be expected, because this core is evidently from PID 16028: > [New LWP 16028] If you can identify the exact query that 16028 was running from your logs, that would be helpful. Or, if you still have this same core file laying about, "p debug_query_string" in gdb would probably be a more trustworthy guide than trying to match up log entries. >> That would be nice. I have let pgbench -C run for one hour with select >> * from pg_stat_activity running every second (\watch 1) in parallel >> but I could not reproduce the issue on HEAD. Yeah, I tried similar experiments without result. Presumably there is some other triggering condition here, but it's hard to guess what. I tried things like doing VACUUM FULL on pg_database and pg_authid to force replan cycles on the view, but no crash. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: