Re: this is in plain text (row level locks)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: this is in plain text (row level locks) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14295.1059012231@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: this is in plain text (row level locks) (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: this is in plain text (row level locks)
Re: this is in plain text (row level locks) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote: >> Does pgsql only record X locks on the individual tuples on-disk or >> does it do so for S locks as well ? > We don't need to shared lock individual rows because of MVCC --- well, > we sort of do by recording our xid in our proc structure, so folks don't > change things underneath us. We prevent expired rows from disappearing > from the disk by others looking at our proc start xid. This is actually an issue though. Row-level shared locks would be really nice to have for foreign-key handling. Right now we have to use X locks for those, and that leads to deadlocking problems for applications. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: