Re: Race condition in InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots()
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Race condition in InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1425810.1624130210@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Race condition in InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots() (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Race condition in InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > It occurred to me that this could be made better by sigstopping both > walreceiver and walsender, then letting only the latter run; AFAICS this > makes the test stable. I'll register this on the upcoming commitfest to > let cfbot run it, and if it looks good there I'll get it pushed to > master. If there's any problem I'll just remove it before beta2 is > stamped. Hmm ... desmoxytes has failed this test once, out of four runs since it went in: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=desmoxytes&dt=2021-06-19%2003%3A06%3A04 None of the other animals that have reported in so far are unhappy. Still, maybe that's not a track record we want to have for beta2? I've just launched a run on gaur, which given its dinosaur status might be the most likely animal to have an actual portability problem with this test technique. If you want to wait a few hours to see what it says, that'd be fine with me. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: