Re: should libpq also require TLSv1.2 by default?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: should libpq also require TLSv1.2 by default? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 142460.1593276921@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: should libpq also require TLSv1.2 by default? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes: >> SSL_R_UNKNOWN_PROTOCOL seem to covers cases when someone manages to perform >> something which OpenSSL believes is a broken SSLv2 connection, but their own >> client-level code use it to refer to SSL as well as TLS. Maybe it's worth >> adding as a belts and suspenders type thing? > No objection on my part. >> If anything it might useful to document in the comment that we're only >> concerned with TLS versions, SSL2/3 are disabled in the library initialization. > Good point. Pushed with those corrections. I also rewrote the comment about which error codes we'd seen in practice, after realizing that one of my tests had been affected by the presence of "MinProtocol = TLSv1.2" in RHEL8's openssl.cnf (causing a max setting less than that to be a local configuration error, not something the server had rejected). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: