Re: [HACKERS] ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14225.951544893@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN
Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > You can exclusively lock the table, then do a heap_getnext() scan over > the entire table, remove the dropped column, do a heap_insert(), then a > heap_delete() on the current tuple, making sure to skip over the tuples > inserted by the current transaction. When completed, remove the column > from pg_attribute, mark the transaction as committed (if desired), and > run vacuum over the table to remove the deleted rows. Hmm, that would work --- the new tuples commit at the same instant that the schema updates commit, so it should be correct. You have the 2x disk usage problem, but there's no way around that without losing rollback ability. A potentially tricky bit will be persuading the tuple-reading and tuple- writing subroutines to pay attention to different versions of the tuple structure for the same table. I haven't looked to see if this will be difficult or not. If you can pass the TupleDesc explicitly then it shouldn't be a problem. I'd suggest that the cleanup vacuum *not* be an automatic part of the operation; just recommend that people do it ASAP after dropping a column. Consider needing to drop several columns... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: