Re: pg_locks needs a facelift
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_locks needs a facelift |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14187.1115178221@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_locks needs a facelift ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_locks needs a facelift
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org> writes: > On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:22:08AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote: >> 1998 when the oid played a larger role, it is now quite rightly >> deprecated and my intention is to remove it from the userlock module. > I wish you wouldn't since http://rrs.decibel.org uses it. Don't worry, I'll veto any immediate removal of functionality ;-) The correct way to handle this is to add some better userlock functionality and deprecate what's there. We can remove the crufty stuff in a release or three after it's been officially deprecated ... but there is no reason to remove it immediately. It won't conflict with a better version, just exist alongside. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: