Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1417.1573226360@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better offreplaced (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better offreplaced
Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better offreplaced |
Список | pgsql-docs |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Hmm. Maybe we can say "pristine database" and then add this explanation > in a parenthical comment: > This is particularly handy when restoring a > <literal>pg_dump</literal> dump: the dump script should be restored in a > pristine database (one where no user-defined objects exist and where > system objects have not been altered), to ensure that one recreates > the correct contents of the dumped database, without conflicting > with objects that might have been added to > <literal>template1</literal> later on. So the patch becomes s/virgin/pristine/g plus add a parenthetical definition for the first use? Works for me. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: