Re: primary key error message
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: primary key error message |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14168.1264109352@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: primary key error message (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: primary key error message
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On tor, 2010-01-21 at 15:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> This patch fails to cover all cases (index build being the obvious >> omission, but I think there might be other paths as well where the >> information is not so readily available). > This is the user-visible error message, and that's the only place it's > generated. Hardly ... regression=# create table foo (f1 int); CREATE TABLE regression=# insert into foo values(1),(1); INSERT 0 2 regression=# alter table foo add primary key (f1); NOTICE: ALTER TABLE / ADD PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "foo_pkey" for table "foo" ERROR: could not create unique index "foo_pkey" DETAIL: Key (f1)=(1) is duplicated. >> And I agree with Robert that the usefulness is at best highly debatable. > The usefulness is that they are different kinds of objects that are > defined and listed in different ways and it would be slightly helpful if > the error message pointed in the righter direction. It is not incorrect to refer to a primary key as a unique constraint. Will you next be wanting the error messages about null values to distinguish whether the NOT NULL constraint came from a primary key? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: