Re: Would you help to review our modifications
От | David G Johnston |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Would you help to review our modifications |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1413820952474-5823679.post@n5.nabble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Would you help to review our modifications (rohtodeveloper <rohtodeveloper@outlook.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Would you help to review our modifications
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
rohtodeveloper wrote > So how to deal with this kind of situation if I want a implicit > conversion? As of the out-of-support 8.3 release many of the implicit casts previously defined have been changed to explicit casts. It is a catalog change - obviously, since you can still define implicit casts - so if you absolutely must have the pre-existing cast be implicit you can modify the catalog directly. You may wish to describe why you think this is the solution you need - with implicit casting there are generally more downsides that upsides. Dave -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Would-you-help-to-review-our-modifications-tp5823666p5823679.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: