Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1409778857.7980.YahooMailNeo@web122305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers (Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> wrote: >> Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org> wrote: >>> The concept of "lightweight relations" that pop into existence when a >>> certain kind of trigger definition is used somewhere in the function >>> stack, without a CREATE TABLE, without being discoverable in >>> information_schema etc., I find needs some more justification than >>> I've seen in this thread. So far I've only heard that it's more >>> convenient to implement in the current PostgreSQL code base. >> >> It is required by the SQL standard. > > I had a cursory read of the SQL 20nn draft and I don't get this > impression. The only place I could find discussing the behavior of > "transition tables" is in Foundation "4.39.1 General description of > triggers", which says: > > "Special variables make the data in the transition table(s) available > to the triggered action. For a statement-level > trigger the variable is one whose value is a transition table." > > There is no information about the scoping of such variables, so I > assume it refers to a regular locally scoped variable. > > Did I miss something? Apparently. I did a search on the document and counted and got 101 occurrences of "transition table". I might be off by a few, but that should be pretty close. Perhaps this, from 4.14 most directly answers your point: | A transient table is a named table that may come into existence | implicitly during the evaluation of a <query expression> or the | execution of a trigger. A transient table is identified by a | <query name> if it arises during the evaluation of a <query | expression>, or by a <transition table name> if it arises during | the execution of a trigger. Such tables exist only for the | duration of the executing SQL-statement containing the <query | expression> or for the duration of the executing trigger. > Are you reading a different version of the spec? I'm looking at a draft of 200x from 2006-02-01. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: