Re: Function C and INOUT parameters
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Function C and INOUT parameters |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14090.1237943924@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Function C and INOUT parameters (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Function C and INOUT parameters
Re: Function C and INOUT parameters |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > I'm not sure about -interfaces, but -performance, -sql, -jdbc and others > definitely have specific audiences and themes which they are already > handling a *lot* of traffic for. It does look like -interfaces is dying: almost no traffic, and what questions it does get are off-topic more often than not. Partly this is because the -jdbc, -odbc, and -php lists suck away all the traffic about those interfaces, leaving not much. So we could kill -interfaces without much loss IMHO. The other global lists seem to be in good health from what I can see. Can't speak to the regional or user-group lists, I don't follow them. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: