Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Chuck McDevitt wrote:
>> I think it's because it's __stdcall, and the name gets mangled to
>> include the number of parameters.
> Aha! now it makes sense. How do we get around that in the configure tests?
I thought it might be something like that ... but the question remains:
how/why is getaddrinfo different from all the other library routines we
probe for?
regards, tom lane