Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Tune GetSnapshotData() during Hot Standby by avoiding loop
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Tune GetSnapshotData() during Hot Standby by avoiding loop |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14068.1271688932@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Tune GetSnapshotData() during Hot Standby by avoiding loop (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Tune GetSnapshotData()
during Hot Standby by avoiding loop
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 17:44 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >>> Choices are >>> 1. Check RecoveryInProgress() once outside of lock, plus wild rumour of >>> Murphy >>> 2. Check RecoveryInProgress() before and after holding lock >>> 3. Check RecoveryInProgress() while holding lock >> >> 4. Check RecoveryInProgress() once outside of lock, and scan the >> ProcArray anyway, just in case. That's what we did before this patch. >> Document that takenDuringRecovery == true means that the snapshot was >> most likely taken during recovery, but there is some race conditions >> where takenDuringRecovery is true even though the snapshot was taken >> just after recovery finished. AFAICS all of the other current uses of >> takenDuringRecovery work fine with that. > Checking RecoveryInProgress() is much cheaper than scanning the whole > ProcArray, so (4) is definitely worse than 1-3. If the lock we're talking about is an LWLock, #3 is okay. If it's a spinlock, not so much. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: