Re: effective_cache_size vs units
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14040.1166573774@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: effective_cache_size vs units (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Re: effective_cache_size vs units Re: effective_cache_size vs units Re: effective_cache_size vs units |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > Perhaps it would be more effective to clarify the error message? Right > now it just says something to the effect of "invalid integer". I'd > imagine "invalid memory unit: TB" would be less confusing. +1 on that, but I think we should just accept the strings case-insensitively, too. SQL in general is not case sensitive for keywords, and neither is anything else in the postgresql.conf file, so I argue it's inconsistent to be strict about the case for units. Nor do I believe that we'd ever accept a future patch that made the distinction between "kb" and "kB" significant --- if you think people are confused now, just imagine what would happen then. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: