Re: [HACKERS] please review source(SQLServer compatible)
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] please review source(SQLServer compatible) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1403544175.59058.YahooMailNeo@web122302.mail.ne1.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: please review source(SQLServer compatible) (Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] please review source(SQLServer compatible)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com> wrote: > On 06/23/2014 04:51 PM, rohtodeveloper wrote: >> 1.SQL statement support >> INSERT statement without INTO keyword >> DELETE statement without FROM keywork > > Why would we want this? I'm pretty sure that the only argument for it is to ease migration of software from other DBMS products which allow that non-standard syntax for people who have chosen to use the non-standard form of the statement instead of the standard syntax (which is also available in all cases that I know of). If the SQL standard were static, I would actually lean toward allowing it, to make it easier for people to switch to PostgreSQL. The biggest down side I see is the possibility that some future version of the standard might implement some new syntax which is more difficult to implement if we need to also support this non-standard variation. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: