Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file

Op 12-09-2022 om 16:00 schreef Erik Rijkers:
> Op 12-09-2022 om 09:58 schreef Daniel Gustafsson:
>>> On 9 Sep 2022, at 11:00, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sep 9, 2022, at 5:53 PM, John Naylor 
>>>> <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> 
>>>> [v4-0001-Add-include-exclude-filtering-via-file-in-pg_dump.patch]
> 
> I noticed that pg_restore --filter cannot, or at last not always, be 
> used with the same filter-file that was used to produce a dump with 
> pg_dump --filter.
> 
> Is that as designed?  It seems a bit counterintuitive.  It'd be nice if 
> that could be fixed.  Admittedly, the 'same' problem in pg_restore -t, 
> also less than ideal.
> 
> (A messy bashdemo below)

I hope the issue is still clear, even though in the bash I sent, I 
messed up the dumpfile name (i.e., in the bash that I sent the pg_dump 
creates another dump name than what is given to pg_restore. They should 
use the same dumpname, obviously)

> 
> thanks,
> 
> Erik Rijkers