Re: Silencing NOTICEs in Perl Pg
От | David Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Silencing NOTICEs in Perl Pg |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13A687F0-BB83-11D6-B671-0003931A964A@wheeler.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Silencing NOTICEs in Perl Pg (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>) |
Ответы |
Re: Silencing NOTICEs in Perl Pg
Re: Silencing NOTICEs in Perl Pg |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Thursday, August 29, 2002, at 12:04 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Just because it is the standard way doesn't mean its the best way. > Pg is tied closely to libpg which may provide advantages in some cases. DBD::Pg is built with libpg, too, IIRC. > For example, I believe DBI has a lame way to do things when autocommit > is off. > It immediately starts a transaction rather than wait for a begin > statement > to be sent. This has consequences that may not always be desirable. Hrm, I've never head DBI called "lame" before. But its advantages lie in its standardization of database access. But yes, some might consider that a limitation. BTW, the relatively new DBI begin_work() method may have overcome the issue you raise. Regards, David -- David Wheeler AIM: dwTheory david@wheeler.net ICQ: 15726394 http://david.wheeler.net/ Yahoo!: dew7e Jabber: Theory@jabber.org
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: