Re: BUG #9611: Current jdbc driver doesn't support any classes in Java 8 java.time
От | David Johnston |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #9611: Current jdbc driver doesn't support any classes in Java 8 java.time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1395115417340-5796525.post@n5.nabble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #9611: Current jdbc driver doesn't support any classes in Java 8 java.time (vwu98034@lycos.com) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: BUG #9611: Current jdbc driver doesn't support any
classes in Java 8 java.time
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Vernon E wrote > The following bug has been logged on the website: > > Bug reference: 9611 > Logged by: Vernon > Email address: > vwu98034@ > PostgreSQL version: 9.3.3 > Operating system: Windows 8 > Description: > > I can't map any Java 8 java.time classes to timestamp with/without time > zone. The old Java Date, Calendar classes will be deprecated in a near > future. This is neither the correct forum nor a bug. I haven't given this much thought but... 1. Deprecated does not mean gone 2. Coding a Java 8 driver would seem to require de-supporting any prior versions...which seems strange but anyway 3. Not that you necessarily need to but do you have anything to add besides the request itself 4. For all I know you may just be doing it wrong...the lack of detail and my desire to not get dragged into the java 8 rabbit hole at this moment do not combine for a helpful response, sorry. There is a jdbc list where this is on topic and you could also post an issue request to the official github repository. Given the state of Java for the past while there isn't a large, active development team working on the current official driver and only a few groups working on new ones. I would encourage those with a current need to figure out ways to contribute to the effort either with pseudo code, actual code, or even just research and suggestions. David J. -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/BUG-9611-Current-jdbc-driver-doesn-t-support-any-classes-in-Java-8-java-time-tp5796517p5796525.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: