Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
От | Pavel Golub |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bytea vs. pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1394226912.20090709155205@gf.microolap.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bytea vs. pg_dump (Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, Bernd. You wrote: BH> --On Dienstag, Juli 07, 2009 18:07:08 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> BH> wrote: >> Enum. If we do this then it seems entirely fair that someone might >> want other settings someday. Also, it seems silly to pick a format >> partly on the grounds that it's expansible, and then not make the >> control GUC expansible. Perhaps >> >> SET bytea_output = [ hex | traditional ] BH> I like the enum much better, too, but BH> SET bytea_output = [ hex | escape ] BH> looks better to me (encode/decode are using something like this already). BH> -- BH> Thanks BH> Bernd Yeah, this looks nice for me too -- With best wishes,Pavel mailto:pavel@gf.microolap.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: