Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13920.949905403@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com> writes: > At 12:26 AM 2/7/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> It would be interesting to poke at Oracle to find out just what they >> consider a legitimate ORDER BY expression for a SELECT DISTINCT. > I have full-time access to an Oracle installation, so fire away > regarding examples and questions. Well, try these on for size: select distinct x from foo order by x+1; select distinct x+1 from foo order by x+1; select distinct x+1 from foo order by x; select distinct x+1 from foo order by x+2; select distinct x+y from foo order by x+y; select distinct x,y from foo order by x+y; select distinct x+y from foo order by x,y; select distinct x+y from foo order by x-y; A human can easily see that all but the last two are well-defined, but I'll be a little surprised if Oracle knows it... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: