Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13860344-1fd9-26cf-087c-32f464a46381@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking
LSN progress
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/27/16 6:16 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > I apologize in advance that the comments in this message might > one of the ideas discarded in the past thread.. I might not grasp > the discussion completely X( > > The attached patches are rebased to the master and additional one > mentioned below. I tried the attached patch set and noticed an interesting behavior. With archive_timeout=5 whenever I made a change I would get a WAL segment within a few seconds as expected then another one would follow a few minutes later. Database init: 16M Sep 27 20:05 000000010000000000000001 16M Sep 27 20:09 000000010000000000000002 Create test table: 16M Sep 27 20:13 000000010000000000000003 16M Sep 27 20:15 000000010000000000000004 Insert row into test table: 16M Sep 27 20:46 000000010000000000000005 16M Sep 27 20:49 000000010000000000000006 The cluster was completely idle with no sessions connected in between those three commands. Is it possible this is caused by: + * switch segment only when any substantial progress have made from + * the last segment switching by timeout. Segment switching by other + * reasons will cause last_xlog_switch_lsn stay behind but it doesn't + * matter since it just causes possible one excessive segment switch. */ I would like to give Michael a chance to respond to the updated patches before delving deeper. -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: