Re: Should we improve documentation on isolation levels?
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should we improve documentation on isolation levels? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1385581591.20715.YahooMailNeo@web162906.mail.bf1.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Should we improve documentation on isolation levels? (AK <alkuzo@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should we improve documentation on isolation levels?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
AK <alkuzo@gmail.com> wrote: > The following is not precise: > > 13.2.1. Read Committed Isolation Level > > "Also note that two successive SELECT commands can see different data, even > though they are within a single transaction, if other transactions commit > changes during execution of the first SELECT." > > I think it should be re-worded as follows > > "Also note that two successive SELECT commands can see different data, even > though they are within a single transaction, if other transactions commit > after the first SELECT starts, and before the second SELECT starts." > > The reason: there could be other DML running between these two SELECTs. That's a fair point. I'll commit something to the master branch. I don't think this rises to the level of a documentation bug that needs to be back-patched. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: