Re: Does LC_CTYPE affect performance, index use?
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Does LC_CTYPE affect performance, index use? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1385089582.15352.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Does LC_CTYPE affect performance, index use? (Steven Dodd <steve@streetcontxt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 14:57 -0500, Steven Dodd wrote: > I've read that setting LC_COLLATE to something other than "C" / > "POSIX" negatively affects performance, and disables use of indexes > for LIKE, etc... It doesn't disable the use of indexes, you just need to create different indexes. > Does the same apply to LC_CTYPE? Yes. > I am considering setting LC_COLLATE = "C", and LC_CTYPE = > "en_US.UTF-8", and using LOWER() to case-fold strings for sorting, and > equality. The motivation for setting LC_CTYPE = "en_US.UTF-8", instead > of "C", is to gain at least some degree of case-folding for > international characters. > Does this sound like a reasonable plan? No, if you need internalized behavior, then set both LC_COLLATE and LC_CTYPE to en_US.UTF-8 (or some other suitable locale) and check the relevant documentation sections about how to create the right indexes.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: