Re: BUG #13796: ALTER TYPE DROP COLUMN -- unexpected behavior ?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #13796: ALTER TYPE DROP COLUMN -- unexpected behavior ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13819.1449598598@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #13796: ALTER TYPE DROP COLUMN -- unexpected behavior ? (pplachta@gmail.com) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #13796: ALTER TYPE DROP COLUMN -- unexpected behavior ?
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
pplachta@gmail.com writes: > create type complex as (a1 int, a2 numeric, a3 text, a4 int, a5 int); > create or replace function foo(arg complex) returns complex as $$ > begin > return ( select arg ); > end; $$ language plpgsql; > alter type complex drop attribute a4; > [ foo() stops working ] Yeah, the problem is that since "arg" has a named composite type, it is handled using the PLPGSQL_DTYPE_ROW code path, which sets up a plpgsql Datum for each column at function compile time. So the rowtype is baked into the function at that point. If you start a fresh session everything is fine. A real fix might involve switching over to the PLPGSQL_DTYPE_REC code path, which I've advocated for for some time but it'd be pretty invasive. Or perhaps we could arrange to force recompilation of a plpgsql function if any composite type it depends on has changed. Nobody's really gotten excited enough about this to do either ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: