Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13819.1064882905@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta) (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes: > I think I can accept it to be the choice of the DBA what to do. Pg_dump > has that kind of options already, one can choose between COPY and INSERT > for example. Why not adding the choice of dumping FKeys as ALTER TABLE > or CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER? We don't want it dumping as CREATE CONSTRAINT TRIGGER, because (a) that loses pg_depend information and (b) it's too low-level a representation; we couldn't ever change the implementation of foreign keys as long as dumps look like that. Also, I don't see why you'd want to make such a choice at pg_dump time. Probably better to control it at restore time. Accordingly, my proposal if we were to go that route would be a boolean GUC variable that simply prevents ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY from doing the validity checks. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: